Interactive workbench
Security Group Rule Visualizer
Convert security group rules into a readable traffic matrix and risk summary.
Which rules are public, which are risky, and where is this network policy too permissive?
How to use & What you leave with
Configuration Suite
Surgically adjust parameters for Security Group Audit
Methodology
This tool automates the core architectural decisions required for high-performance scale. It eliminates spreadsheet errors and gut feeling by using post-2026 optimized algorithms.
Output Precision
- Surgical accuracy for production loads
- Ready for direct export to Terraform/Docs
Paste lines like: ingress tcp 443 0.0.0.0/0 web-https. Supports JSON arrays too.
PRO TIP: Changes reflect in real-time. Use shortcuts for fast navigation.
Total rules
5
Critical findings
2
High findings
0
Public rules
4
CIS compliance
3/5
Risk score
High
Key Insights
- 5 rules parsed: 2 critical, 0 high, 0 medium, 2 low severity. 1 properly scoped.
- Critical: tcp/22 from 0.0.0.0/0; all/all from 0.0.0.0/0. These must be remediated before production.
- CIS AWS Foundations: 3/5 checks passed. No SSH (22) open to 0.0.0.0/0; Egress is restricted (not open to all)
Actionable Next Steps
- Immediately restrict 2 critical finding(s): 22 from 0.0.0.0/0, all from 0.0.0.0/0.
- High-severity rules are clean.
- Export the audit report and attach to the change request or security review ticket.
- Address 2 failing CIS checks to improve compliance posture.
Analysis Metrics
Benchmarks & Comparison
| Direction | Protocol | Port | Source | Severity | Category | Remediation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ingress | tcp | 443 | 0.0.0.0/0 | LOW | Web traffic (expected) | Ensure WAF and DDoS protection are in place. |
| ingress | tcp | 80 | 0.0.0.0/0 | LOW | Web traffic (expected) | Ensure WAF and DDoS protection are in place. |
| ingress | tcp | 22 | 0.0.0.0/0 | CRITICAL | Admin access from internet | Restrict 22 to VPN/bastion CIDR. Use SSM Session M… |
| ingress | tcp | 5432 | 10.0.0.0/8 | INFO | Internal/scoped rule | No action needed — rule is properly scoped. |
| egress | all | all | 0.0.0.0/0 | CRITICAL | Admin access from internet | Restrict all to VPN/bastion CIDR. Use SSM Session … |
Actionable Exports
Decision Log
This tool automates the core architectural decisions required for high-performance scale.
Surgical Precision
Eliminate spreadsheet errors and gut feeling with post-2026 AI.
Seamless Workflow
Move results straight to Terraform, Jira, or Confluence.

The Lab Result
Post-2026 Audit Complete
This workflow has been surgically optimized by AutonomOps AI for Architecto Power Users.
FAQ
Questions teams ask before they adopt this workflow.
When should teams use Security Group Rule Visualizer?
This tool is most useful when the team needs an answer they can carry into diagrams, documentation, and design reviews without rewriting the same context three times.
Who benefits most from Security Group Rule Visualizer?
Architects, platform teams, and technical leads benefit most because they need explicit assumptions, clear review cues, and artifacts that survive implementation handoff.
How does Security Group Rule Visualizer connect back to Architecto?
Architecto uses the free content surface as the top of a larger workflow. Once the team needs richer diagrams, schema visibility, change comparison, or technical documentation, the matching product module keeps the same decision context alive.
Related workflow paths
Keep moving with the next tool, guide, or product module.

Related tool
SLO / Error Budget Calculator
Work out monthly, quarterly, and annual error budgets for critical services and tie them back to release, incident, and support policies.

Related tool
Architecture Review Checklist Builder
Build repeatable review packets for cloud architectures, migrations, data systems, and internal platforms without relying on static spreadsheets.

Guide
What trust boundaries means in Security Architecture
What trust boundaries means in Security Architecture with technical review guidance, practical artifacts, and a workflow path into diagrams, documentation, and architecture governance.

Guide
iam and access control checklist for Security Architecture
iam and access control checklist for Security Architecture with technical review guidance, practical artifacts, and a workflow path into diagrams, documentation, and architecture governance.

Comparison
Architecto vs ChartDB
Architecto vs ChartDB with a workflow-first comparison across diagrams, architecture review, technical documentation, and code-adjacent implementation evidence.
Continue in Architecto
Use the exported artifact from Security Group Rule Visualizer as the first review input, then move into Security Posture when the team needs a deeper design, diagram, or review workflow.
Open matching moduleRelated modules